Js_of_ocaml vs Mint
When comparing Js_of_ocaml vs Mint, the Slant community recommends Js_of_ocaml for most people. In the question“What are the best languages that compile to JavaScript? ” Js_of_ocaml is ranked 33rd while Mint is ranked 44th. The most important reason people chose Js_of_ocaml is:
Js_of_ocaml brings all OCaml features to Javascript: static typing, type inference, modules, functional programming style...
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro All OCaml features
Js_of_ocaml brings all OCaml features to Javascript: static typing, type inference, modules, functional programming style...
Pro Writen in Crystal (Language)
Crystal is one of the best and elegant languages.
Pro Constructs for synchronous and asynchronous computations
Pro Easy to learn and write
Everything is an expression.
Pro HTML and CSS integration
HTML can be written with minimal differences.
Scoped .CSS can be written for elements in components.
Pro Good error support
200+ unique error messages to help you on the way.
Pro Everything is typed
Everything is typed using a simple type system
Pro Dead code elimination
Only used parts of the code compiles into the final bundle.
Pro Built-in formatter
Mint has a built-in formatter to format your code, it can run standalone or with the development server.
Pro Batteries included
Mint contains everything you need to build the frontend of web applications from styling to data storage through HTTP requests to testing.
Pro Integrated testing
Testing is part of the language and there is a test runner built in which runs tests in the browser.
Cons
Con Documentation
Documentation is still scarce