When comparing MT Lucida Sans Typewriter vs Google Noto Sans Mono, the Slant community recommends MT Lucida Sans Typewriter for most people. In the question“What are the best programming fonts?” MT Lucida Sans Typewriter is ranked 67th while Google Noto Sans Mono is ranked 102nd. The most important reason people chose MT Lucida Sans Typewriter is:
Other fonts look to "wide" for me.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Good width to height ratio
Other fonts look to "wide" for me.
Pro Very legible
Pro Excellent support for Unicode characters
Unicode uses 16 bits per character, meaning that it can represent more than 65,000 unique characters.
Cons
Con The zero character is not sufficiently well distinguished from the capital "O" character
Especially in programming, the zero character needs a slash to distinguish it from similar circular or oval characters.
Con Zero is difficult to identify
As it's not dotted or slashed, "0" is more difficult to distinguish.
Con Non-monospace ligature replacements for 'fl', 'fi', 'ffl', 'ffi'
By default, the substrings 'fl', 'fi', 'ffl', and 'ffi' are each crammed into one character width, making it not a truly monospace font. For example, the word 'flag' is rendered as three characters wide.
Con Letters capital 'i' and lowercase 'L' are too similar
The only difference is almost unnoticable.
Con Difficult to distinguish between a period and acomma as well as a colon and a semi-colon
Comma has very small tail, making it difficult to distinguish from a period (full stop). Same applies to colon and semi-colon.