When comparing lf vs Worker, the Slant community recommends Worker for most people. In the question“What are the best file managers for UNIX-like systems?” Worker is ranked 21st while lf is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose Worker is:
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Uses a server/client architecture to share file selection between multiple instances
This lets you open lf in two different terminals or tabs and do things like copy something on one terminal to the other.
Pro ranger like ui
Pro Works on Windows
Pro Fast startup and low memory footprint due to native code and static binaries
Pro Single binary without any runtime dependencies except for terminfo database
Pro Configurable with shell commands
Pro Innumerable button-click file ops are integrated
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Pro Remote access
Worker supports access to remote machines through various ways (ssh, ftp, rsh, http and webdav).
Pro Low system requirements
The system requirements for Worker are pretty low, making it a great option for lower-end machines. The reason why they are pretty low is because Worker is basically made of just X11 libraries.
Pro Configuration GUI
Worker has a built-in configuration GUI.