SCSS vs CSS-On-Diet
When comparing SCSS vs CSS-On-Diet, the Slant community recommends SCSS for most people. In the question“What are the best CSS preprocessors/postprocessors?” SCSS is ranked 11th while CSS-On-Diet is ranked 15th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast to read and write CSS
Works like Emmet, shorting CSS keywords, but it's not limited only to writing. Also modifying and reading COD(CSS-On-Diet) files is faster.
Pro Easy to learn and use
Doesn't require programming skill to work with variables, mixins, media breakpoints
Cons
Con It's difficult adjusting to different keywords
The keywords are shortened to 3 letters. For example, "background-color" becomes "bac" and "max-width" becomes "maw". These keywords are far less intuitive than their original form and make the CSS much less readable for those who don't know CSS-On-Diet.
Con Extremely limited adoption
CSS-On-Diet has just 7 stars on Github and a very small adoption rate. For an open source project this usually means less bugs reported, lesser documentation and few third-party learning resources.
![Vetted.ai illustration](/images/ai/vetted-illustration.png)