When comparing StumpWM vs Hyprland, the Slant community recommends Hyprland for most people. In the question“What are the best window managers for UNIX-like systems?” Hyprland is ranked 16th while StumpWM is ranked 41st. The most important reason people chose Hyprland is:
Animations smoother than you can imagine.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Integration with Common Lisp Packages
StumpWM is really just a Common Lisp core that also happens to run your WM. You can execute any Common Lisp code you want through the REPL, related to or unrelated to your actual WM. You can tie together your workflow with any of the complex Lisp Packages or utilities. It's really just all the power of Lisp in a WM.
Pro You can tweak it without restarting
As StumpWM is a Common Lisp app, you can have it run arbitrary lisp code at runtime. This means you can tweak your configuration and see the effects immediately.
Pro Smooth
Animations smoother than you can imagine.
Pro Uses wlroots
The best Wayland compositor library built on standards.
Pro Plugins
Has a plugin system.
Pro Beautiful
Pro Easy to customize
Has a nice wiki which makes customizing it very easy.
Cons
Con it will take more tike to figure out and configure everything to your likes.
Con Early development stages
It has a few bugs and missing features.
Con Difficult setup
It has a lot of dependencies which is difficult to find and build in Debian. Also most dependencies are not found in the system repository.