1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear (2016) vs Bowers & Wilkins C5 Series 2 (2014)

We couldn't find enough data on either product to be able to come to any reliable conclusions. We highly recommend that you take a look at some other options instead.

The 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear (2016) has managed to impress reviewers from some of the most highly trusted sources on the internet, including Rtings and SoundGuys. It performed great in their in-depth hands-on roundups - it was awarded the "Top Pick" title by Reviewed and "Best Wired Earbuds For Small Ears" by Rtings in their respective Earphone roundups. That's high praise, especially when coming from such high-quality sources.

Taking a look at the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - PCmag and Head-fi - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.

Out of the sources that tested and rated both of these Earphones, Head-fi preferred the 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear (2016), whereas reviewers at ilounge.com liked the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) better. PCmag gave them identical review scores.

We also took a look at which sources liked these products best - the highest 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear (2016) rating came from Head-fi, whereas the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) most impressed reviewers at PCmag; they earned scores of 10 and 9, respectively.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear (2016) and Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) managed averages of 8.8 and 8.5 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear (2016) vs. Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.