Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Asus PA Series QHD IPS monitors (2020) vs Acer ConceptD series monitors 2019
The Asus Pro Art PA278QV is a great Monitor for its $289 asking price.
The Acer ConceptD CP7271K 27", however, while a reasonable product for $2478, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Monitors in the $2,200 range, you might want to check out some better options.
The Asus Pro Art PA278QV managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - Rtings and Digital Camera World - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.
As for the Acer ConceptD CP7271K 27", it was really well-received by reviewers at Tom's Hardware, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best 4K Gaming Monitors for PC 2021: 144Hz, Curved and More" roundup and was named its "Best 4K Gaming Monitor for Professionals", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Asus Pro Art PA278QV got its highest, 8, rating from Rtings, while the Acer ConceptD CP7271K 27" earned its best, 9, score from Tom's Hardware.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Asus Pro Art PA278QV and Acer ConceptD CP7271K 27" managed averages of 8.0 and 8.4 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Asus Pro Art PA278QV vs. Acer ConceptD CP7271K 27" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing