Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Acer Nitro XV series WQHD monitors 2019 vs Acer Predator XB series 4K monitors (2016)
The Acer Nitro XV340CK is a great Monitor for its $449 asking price.
The Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz, however, is merely passable at its $2062 price point. If you're considering buying a Monitor in the $2,200 range, you might want to check out some of its competitors.
The Acer Nitro XV340CK was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 6 Best 1440p Gaming Monitors - Winter 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best Ultrawide 1440p Gaming Monitor", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz - it impressed reviewers at PC Gamer, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Best 4K gaming monitors in 2021" roundup - in fact, it earned its "A great 4K display without the HDR tech." title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Acer Nitro XV340CK got its highest, 7.9, rating from Rtings, while the Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz earned its best, 9.6, score from Gadget Review.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Acer Nitro XV340CK and Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz managed averages of 7.9 and 8.5 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Acer Nitro XV340CK vs. Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing