Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Acer Nitro XV series WQHD monitors 2019 vs Acer Predator XB series QHD monitors 2015
The Acer Nitro XV340CK is a great Monitor for its $449 asking price.
The Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz, however, is merely passable at its $499 price point. If you're considering buying a Monitor in the $620 range, you might want to check out some of its competitors.
The Acer Nitro XV340CK was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 6 Best 1440p Monitors - Winter 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best Ultrawide 1440p Monitor", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz analysis - it impressed reviewers at Windows Central, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best Acer Monitors in 2019" roundup and earned the "Top Pick" title.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Monitors, including Rtings, preferred the Acer Nitro XV340CK over the Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz.
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Acer Nitro XV340CK was liked best by Rtings, which gave it a score of 7.9, while the Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz got its highest, 9.8, score from MonitorNerds.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Acer Nitro XV340CK and Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz managed averages of 7.9 and 8.2 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Acer Nitro XV340CK vs. Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing