Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Acer Nitro XV series WQHD monitors 2019 vs LG WK600 series monitors (2018)
The Acer Nitro XV340CK and LG 29WK600 29" make for good, if unremarkable, Monitors at their respective budgets.
With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $450 and $310 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.
If you want to learn more about the Acer Nitro XV340CK and the LG 29WK600 29", however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:
The Acer Nitro XV340CK was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 6 Best 1440p Monitors - Winter 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best Ultrawide 1440p Monitor", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the LG 29WK600 29" - Windows Central, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Best External Monitors for Dell XPS 15 in 2021 roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Acer Nitro XV340CK got its highest, 7.9, rating from Rtings, while the LG 29WK600 29" earned its best, 9.6, score from MonitorNerds.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Acer Nitro XV340CK and LG 29WK600 29" managed averages of 7.9 and 9.6 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Acer Nitro XV340CK vs. LG 29WK600 29" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing