Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Acer VU series monitors (2018) vs Acer R1 series monitors (2016)
The Acer V277U bmiipx and the Acer R271 bid are decent Monitors at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $320 or $210.
If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the Acer V277U bmiipx and the Acer R271 bid, however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:
The Acer V277U bmiipx was loved by reviewers at Wirecutter (NYTimes), a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best 27-Inch Monitor" roundup where it was named its "Budget pick", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Taking a look at the Acer R271 bid, we found that it hasn't managed to perform well enough to earn a spot in any Monitor roundups done by sources that conduct their own, high-quality, hands-on testing. That alone makes it difficult to recommend.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Acer V277U bmiipx got its highest, 7.6, rating from Gadget Review, while the Acer R271 bid earned its best, 8, score from 144Hz Monitors.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Acer V277U bmiipx and Acer R271 bid managed averages of 7.6 and 7.8 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Acer V277U bmiipx vs. Acer R271 bid comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.