1More Triple Driver In-Ear BT vs Adidas FWD-01

The 1More Triple Driver In-Ear BT is an example of a great Canal Earphone at its $65 budget.

In the case of the Adidas FWD-01, however, we weren't able to find enough data to come to any reliable conclusions.

inews.co.uk, a review site with a history of doing objective hands-on testing, has great things to say about the 1More Triple Driver In-Ear BT. In fact, it's "Ranked 1 out of 10" in its "10 best in-ear headphones – how to pick between Bose, B&O and more" roundup, which points toward it being a good Canal Earphone.

Taking a look at the Adidas FWD-01, we found it was well-received by reviewers from a couple of reliable sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, including Expert Reviews, Good Housekeeping, and The Independent. It performed great in their Canal Earphone roundups - it managed to earn the "The best running headphones for battery life" title from Expert Reviews, "Best near-wireless headphones for the gym" from Good Housekeeping, and "Ranked 2 out of 10" from The Independent, which is a notable accomplishment.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Canal Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the 1More Triple Driver In-Ear BT got its highest, 10, rating from macsources.com, while the Adidas FWD-01 earned its best, 6, score from PCmag.

Lastly, in order to better compare them to their competition, we averaged out their review scores and found that the 1More Triple Driver In-Ear BT got received considerably better than the majority of other Canal Earphones - it earned an average of 8.7 out of 10 points, compared to the 7.4 overall rating of other Canal Earphones - while the Adidas FWD-01 performed worse than most of its competitors, with its average review score of 6.0.

It's worth keeping in mind, however, that a direct 1More Triple Driver In-Ear BT vs. Adidas FWD-01 comparison might not be realistic since they're priced differently and some sources have a tendency to review more expensive products better than cheaper ones.