JBL Endurance Jump vs AfterShokz Trekz (2015)

While the JBL Endurance Jump makes for a passable Earphone for its asking price, the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $30 or $95.

However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the JBL Endurance Jump and the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015), you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:

The JBL Endurance Jump managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - PCmag and Wirecutter (NYTimes) - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.

As for the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) analysis - it impressed reviewers at Android Central, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best Bone Conduction Headphones in 2021" roundup and earned the "Best Value" title.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the JBL Endurance Jump got its highest, 8, rating from PCmag, while the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) earned its best, 8.8, score from Runnerclick.

Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the JBL Endurance Jump, with its 8.0 average, performed considerably better than most Earphones - the mean score for the product category being 7.3 out of 10 - while the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) managed an average of 6.9.

There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct JBL Endurance Jump vs. AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.