Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Loading
Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016)
AKG K92 (2016)
See Top Ranked Closed-Back Headphones

Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016) vs AKG K92 (2016)

Analysis:

The AKG K92 (2016) and the Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016) are decent Closed-Back Headphones at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $85 or $50.

If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the AKG K92 (2016) and the Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016), however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:

The AKG K92 (2016) hasn't managed to earn a top spot in any roundups from sources that conduct trustworthy hands-on testing. Nevertheless, reviewers from sites, such as What Hi-Fi?, Head-fi, and Techradar all gave it a spot on their list.

Moving on to the Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like SoundGuys, PCmag, CNET, Techradar, Expert Reviews, and Rtings, enough for them to include them on those lists.

We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like Techradar, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.

Then we checked which sources liked these two Closed-Back Headphones best and found that the AKG K92 (2016) got its highest, 10, review score from reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, whereas the Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016) earned its best score of 8.2 from SoundGuys.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Closed-Back Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Closed-Back Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the AKG K92 (2016) and Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016) managed averages of 8.7 and 7.8 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct AKG K92 (2016) vs. Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.

Comparison of expert ratings
Highly Recommended
Recommended
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
SoundGuys
Rtings
CNET
PCmag
Techradar
Expert Reviews
What Hi-Fi?
Head-fi
Lifewire
BestReviews
Tech. Specs Comparison
Skullcandy Grind Wireless (2016)
$59
AKG K92 (2016)
$49
Noise-cancelling
No
No
Wireless
Yes
No
Has average expert review score
7.5
Overall Avg. for Closed-Back Headphones
7.8
Avg. Review Score
Score
Higher than average expert review score
7.5
Overall Avg. for Closed-Back Headphones
8.7
Avg. Review Score
Score
Recommended by trusted experts
Rtings
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The 6 Best Wireless Bluetooth Headphones Under $100 - Spring 2021” 
Last updated: 2 Apr 2021
Techradar
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “Holiday Gift Guide 2016: TechRadar’s best tech gifts you can actually afford” 
Last updated: 14 Nov 2016
Rtings
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The 5 Best Headphones Under $50 - Spring 2021” 
Last updated: 31 Mar 2021
Recommendations
BestReviews
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Runner Up
in “Best AKG Headphones” 
Last updated: 10 Nov 2020

Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
undefinedurl nextprice drop