Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Alienware AW3423DW 34" vs Gigabyte Aorus FV43U
The Alienware AW3423DW 34" is one of the very best Monitors that one can get for around $700. The Gigabyte Aorus FV43U, however, while a very good choice at its $500 price point, falls just short of being remarkable.
Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the Alienware AW3423DW 34" to be a great product - it earned the "Best Gaming Monitor" title from Rtings and "Ranked 1 out of 7" from CNET in their respective Monitor roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.
As for the Gigabyte Aorus FV43U - it was really well-received by reviewers at Tom's Hardware, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best 4K Gaming Monitors for PC 2023: 144Hz, Curved and More" roundup and was named its "Best Big-Screen 4K Gaming Monitor", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Monitors, including kitguru.net and TechSpot, preferred the Alienware AW3423DW 34" over the Gigabyte Aorus FV43U.
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Alienware AW3423DW 34" was liked best by PC Gamer, which gave it a score of 9.5, while the Gigabyte Aorus FV43U got its highest, 8.7, score from TechSpot.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Alienware AW3423DW 34" and Gigabyte Aorus FV43U managed averages of 8.7 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Alienware AW3423DW 34" vs. Gigabyte Aorus FV43U comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing