Alienware m15 (2018) vs Gigabyte Aorus 15G (2020)

The Alienware m15 (15.6") (2018) was well-received by reviewers at Windows Central, a trustworthy source that performs unbiased hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best Laptops with RTX Graphics Cards (GPUs) in 2022" roundup - they named it their "Ranked 3 out of 8", which, by itself, suggests that it's a noteworthy product.

As for the Gigabyte Aorus 15G, i7-10750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2020), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Notebookcheck.net, PCmag, CNET, and Tom's Hardware enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

To get a better idea of how they fare when compared directly to each other, we analyzed review scores of sources that tested both. CNET, for example, preferred the Alienware m15 (15.6") (2018), while PCmag rated both of them the same.

We also took a look at which sources had the best things to say about them. We learned that the Alienware m15 (15.6") (2018) got reviewed the highest by Top Ten Reviews - it gave it a rating of 9, while the Gigabyte Aorus 15G, i7-10750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2020) most impressed reviewers at Notebookcheck.net, which gave it a score of 8.7.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Gaming Laptops on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Gaming Laptops being 7.6 out of 10, whereas the Alienware m15 (15.6") (2018) and Gigabyte Aorus 15G, i7-10750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2020) managed averages of 7.8 and 7.9 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Alienware m15 (15.6") (2018) vs. Gigabyte Aorus 15G, i7-10750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2020) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.