Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Netgear Nighthawk AC2200 Plug-In Tri-Band Wi-Fi Mesh Extenders (2017) vs Amped Wireless Athena-EX (2016)
Netgear Nighthawk X4S EX7500 Wi-Fi Mesh Extender (2017)
The Netgear Nighthawk X4S EX7500 Wi-Fi Mesh Extender (2017) was loved by reviewers at CNET, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best Wi-Fi Extenders of 2023: Top Picks Tested and Compared" roundup where it was named its "Great ease-of-use, so-so performance, poor value", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Amped Wireless Athena-EX RE2600M (2016) - PCmag, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Amped Wireless Athena-EX High Power AC2600 Wi-Fi Range Extender (RE2600M) Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like PCmag, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.
Then we checked which sources liked these two Wi-Fi Extenders best and found that the Netgear Nighthawk X4S EX7500 Wi-Fi Mesh Extender (2017) got its highest, 8, review score from reviewers at Expert Reviews, whereas the Amped Wireless Athena-EX RE2600M (2016) earned its best score of 8 from PCmag.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wi-Fi Extenders on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wi-Fi Extenders being 7.1 out of 10, whereas the Netgear Nighthawk X4S EX7500 Wi-Fi Mesh Extender (2017) and Amped Wireless Athena-EX RE2600M (2016) managed averages of 7.8 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Netgear Nighthawk X4S EX7500 Wi-Fi Mesh Extender (2017) vs. Amped Wireless Athena-EX RE2600M (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing