nura nuraphone (2018) vs Apple AirPods (2016)

We couldn't find enough data on either product to be able to come to any reliable conclusions. We highly recommend that you take a look at some other options instead.

The nura nuraphone (2018) was loved by reviewers at Digital Camera World, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The best headphones for video editing in 2022: top quality sound for every budget" roundup where it was named its "Ranked 3 out of 8", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the Apple Airpods (2016) analysis - it impressed reviewers at rizknows.com, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Jabra Elite 65T vs Apple AirPods Review" roundup and earned the "Better Battery Life" title.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Canal Earphones, including WIRED, preferred the nura nuraphone (2018) over the Apple Airpods (2016).

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The nura nuraphone (2018) was liked best by AVForums, which gave it a score of 9, while the Apple Airpods (2016) got its highest, 7.6, score from The Verge.

Lastly, in order to better compare them to their competition, we averaged out their review scores and found that the nura nuraphone (2018) got received considerably better than the majority of other Canal Earphones - it earned an average of 8.4 out of 10 points, compared to the 7.4 overall rating of other Canal Earphones - while the Apple Airpods (2016) performed worse than most of its competitors, with its average review score of 6.2.

It's worth keeping in mind, however, that a direct nura nuraphone (2018) vs. Apple Airpods (2016) comparison might not be realistic since they're priced differently and some sources have a tendency to review more expensive products better than cheaper ones.