ASUS Rog Rapture GT-AX11000 vs ASUS RT-AC68U

The ASUS Rog Rapture GT-AX11000 makes for an outstanding Wi-Fi Router at $342. The ASUS RT-AC68U, however, while overall a good product for its asking price, doesn't quite manage to stand out from its competition - there are better Wi-Fi Routers that can be found for around $230 available here.

Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the ASUS Rog Rapture GT-AX11000 to be a great product - it earned the "Another great Wi-Fi 6 gaming router" title from Tom's Guide and "Ranked 2 out of 9" from PCmag in their respective Wi-Fi Router roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.

As for the ASUS RT-AC68U analysis - it impressed reviewers at MakeUseOf, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "What's the Best Dual-Band Router for Your Small Home?" roundup and earned the "Ranked 2 out of 5" title.

Out of the sources that tested and rated both of these Wi-Fi Routers, PCmag preferred the ASUS Rog Rapture GT-AX11000, whereas reviewers at Expert Reviews liked the ASUS RT-AC68U better. Techradar and Tom's Guide gave them identical review scores.

We also took a look at which sources liked these products best - the highest ASUS Rog Rapture GT-AX11000 rating came from Lifewire, whereas the ASUS RT-AC68U most impressed reviewers at Expert Reviews; they earned scores of 9.2 and 10, respectively.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wi-Fi Routers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wi-Fi Routers being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the ASUS Rog Rapture GT-AX11000 and ASUS RT-AC68U managed averages of 8.5 and 8.8 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct ASUS Rog Rapture GT-AX11000 vs. ASUS RT-AC68U comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.