TP-Link Archer A7 vs ASUS RT-AC68U

The TP-Link Archer A7 is one of the very best Wi-Fi Routers that one can get for around $60. The ASUS RT-AC68U, however, while a very good choice at its $160 price point, falls just short of being remarkable.

The TP-Link Archer A7 has managed to impress reviewers from some of the most highly trusted sources on the internet, including Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide. It performed great in their in-depth hands-on roundups - it was awarded the "Best budget Wi-Fi router" title by Laptop Mag and "Our favorite low-priced wireless router" by Tom's Guide in their respective Wi-Fi Router roundups. That's high praise, especially when coming from such high-quality sources.

Moving on to the ASUS RT-AC68U: it was loved by MakeUseOf and Windows Central - two reliable sources that conduct their own in-depth testing. In fact, it was named "Ranked 2 out of 5" and "Ranked 1 out of 5" in their respective roundups, which points to it being a product worthy of consideration.

We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like Tom's Guide, and learned that they all showed a preference for the ASUS RT-AC68U.

Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two Wi-Fi Routers received. We found that the TP-Link Archer A7 managed to earn a rating of 8 from Tom's Guide, whereas the ASUS RT-AC68U got its highest, 9, score from reviewers at Tom's Guide.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wi-Fi Routers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wi-Fi Routers being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the TP-Link Archer A7 and ASUS RT-AC68U managed averages of 8.0 and 8.5 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct TP-Link Archer A7 vs. ASUS RT-AC68U comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.