Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Asus VG series (2018) vs Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q
The Asus VG279Q is a great Monitor for its $269 asking price.
The Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q, however, while a reasonable product for $574, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Monitors in the $600 range, you might want to check out some better options.
The Asus VG279Q has done great in various roundups conducted by reliable and unbiased sources that do their own testing, like Windows Central, technoburst.com, and Android Authority - it earned the "Best 1080p monitor for Xbox Series S" title from Windows Central, "Ranked 1 out of 4" from technoburst.com, and "Ranked 1 out of 6" from Android Authority.
As for the Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q - Rtings, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q Monitor Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We analyzed all of the review data that we could find on these two Monitors. First, we examined sources that tested and scored both of these products - Rtings favored the Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q over the Asus VG279Q, whereas reviewers at MonitorNerds haven't shown a preference for either.
Then we took a look at which sources liked them the most - we found that the Asus VG279Q was best received by MonitorNerds - it gave it a score of 9.4, whereas the Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q got its highest score of 9.4 from reviewers at MonitorNerds.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Asus VG279Q and Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q managed averages of 8.2 and 8.7 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Asus VG279Q vs. Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing