Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
AOC I series USB monitors (2017) vs Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT
The AOC I1601FWUX 16" and Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT make for good, if unremarkable, Monitors at their respective budgets.
With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $150 and $450 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.
If you want to learn more about the AOC I1601FWUX 16" and the Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT, however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:
The AOC I1601FWUX 16" managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and unbiased sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, namely Expert Reviews, PCmag, and Digital Camera World. It performed great in their roundups - it earned the "The best budget portable monitor" title from Expert Reviews and "Best for Budget-Conscious Road Warriors" from PCmag, which makes it a product worthy of consideration.
As for the Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT, it was really well-received by reviewers at PCmag, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The Best Portable Monitors for 2021" roundup and was named its "Best for Touch-Screen Aficionados", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like PCmag, and learned that they all showed a preference for the Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT.
Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two Monitors received. We found that the AOC I1601FWUX 16" managed to earn a rating of 7 from TrustedReviews, whereas the Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT got its highest, 8, score from reviewers at PCmag.
Finally, we calculated their average review scores from all of the data we could find and compared those to Monitors in general. It turns out that the Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT, with its 8.0 average, got reviewed considerably better than most of its competition - the overall average for Monitors being 7.3 out of 10 points - whereas the AOC I1601FWUX 16" performed worse than most, with an average review score of 6.3.
However, it's worth pointing out that a direct AOC I1601FWUX 16" vs. Asus ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT comparison might not be entirely fair, because some sources have a tendency of not taking value for money into account when reviewing products.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing