Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Beats Studio3 (2017) vs Audio-Technica ATH-AR3 (2016)
The Beats Studio3 (2017) was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 6 Best Headphones For Running - Summer 2023" roundup where it was named its "Best Over-Ear Headphones For Running", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) - TrustedReviews, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
As for a direct Beats Studio3 (2017) vs. Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) comparison of their review performance, we examined sources that tested and rated both products, like TrustedReviews. It turns out that all such sources consider the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) to be the superior product.
We also looked at the available data to find which sources liked each of them best and learned that the Beats Studio3 (2017) most impressed reviewers at techaeris.com - they gave it a score of 9.3, whereas the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) got rated best by TrustedReviews - 9.
Lastly, we averaged out all of their review data to compare them to their competitors. We found that the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016), with its 9.0 out of 10 points, got reviewed noticeably better than most of its competitors - the average Over-Ear Headphone score being 7.5 - whereas the Beats Studio3 (2017) performed worse, with an average of merely 7.1.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing