Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Audio-Technica ATH-M20x (2014) vs Jabra Move Wireless (2014)
The Audio-Technica ATH-M20x (2014) has impressed reviewers from two sources that are among the most highly trusted on the internet, namely Rtings and SoundGuys. It did great in their objective hands-on roundups - it earned the "Best Budget Podcast Headphones" and "Ranked 1 out of 5" awards from Rtings and SoundGuys, respectively. That's high praise from such reputable sources.
As for our analysis of the Jabra Move Wireless (2014) - it has done great in a number of roundups done by unbiased sources that conduct their own testing, like Techradar, Android Central, and iMore - it was named "Wireless headphones that are great companions for any laptop" by Techradar, "The Jabra Move combines great lightweight design with impressive sound quality. The headphones are available in a variety of bold colors, and while there's no AptX, you get decent sound out of them and they last eight hours between charges. If you're in the market for a budget option that sounds great and looks vibrant, the Move is a decent option." by Android Central, and "Ranked 1 out of 4" by iMore.
As for a direct Audio-Technica ATH-M20x (2014) vs. Jabra Move Wireless (2014) comparison of their review performance, we examined sources that tested and rated both products, like SoundGuys. It turns out that all such sources consider the Jabra Move Wireless (2014) to be the superior product.
We also looked at the available data to find which sources liked each of them best and learned that the Audio-Technica ATH-M20x (2014) most impressed reviewers at Rtings - they gave it a score of 7.5, whereas the Jabra Move Wireless (2014) got rated best by PCmag - 8.
Lastly, we calculated their review averages and compared them to their competitors. The average review score for Wireless Headphones in general is 7.3 out of 10, while the Audio-Technica ATH-M20x (2014) and Jabra Move Wireless (2014) earned averages of 7.2 and 7.3, respectively.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing