Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Avantree Aria Pro vs Bowers & Wilkins P7 (2013)
Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wired (2013)
While the Avantree Aria Pro makes for a fairly good Over-Ear Headphone for people with a $85 budget, we weren't able to find enough data on the Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wired (2013) to come to any reliable conclusions.
If you'd nonetheless like to learn more about the Avantree Aria Pro and Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wired (2013), however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:
Android Central, a source known for its hands-on testing and objective methodology, had good things to say about the Avantree Aria Pro. It performed great in its "Best aptX Low Latency headphones 2022" roundup and earned the "Best value" title.
As for the Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wired (2013), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at HomeTheaterReview.com, CNET, and Rtings enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Over-Ear Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Avantree Aria Pro got its highest, 9.1, rating from nerdtechy.com, while the Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wired (2013) earned its best, 9, score from HomeTheaterReview.com.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Over-Ear Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Over-Ear Headphones being 7.5 out of 10, whereas the Avantree Aria Pro and Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wired (2013) managed averages of 7.7 and 8.5 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Avantree Aria Pro vs. Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wired (2013) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.