Ultimate Ears Roll (2016) vs Beats Pill (2015)

While the Ultimate Ears Roll 2 (2016) wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. TechGearLab, What Hi-Fi?, Expert Reviews, SoundGuys, CNET, Tom's Guide, TrustedReviews, Techradar, PCmag, and iMore have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

Moving on to the Beats Pill+ (2015): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like TechGearLab, PCmag, Laptop Mag, CNET, TrustedReviews, Techradar, What Hi-Fi?, and inews.co.uk, enough for them to include them on those lists.

Our direct Ultimate Ears Roll 2 (2016) vs. Beats Pill+ (2015) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Portable Bluetooth Speakers, What Hi-Fi?, CNET, TrustedReviews, and Techradar preferred the Ultimate Ears Roll 2 (2016), whereas TechGearLab and PCmag seemed to like both equally.

We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Ultimate Ears Roll 2 (2016) got its highest, 10, review score from TechGearLab, while the Beats Pill+ (2015) most impressed reviewers at TechGearLab, which gave it a score of 10.

Finally, we compared their average scores to all other Portable Bluetooth Speakers on the market. We found that the Ultimate Ears Roll 2 (2016) got reviewed considerably better than most of its competitors - it earned an average of 8.6, compared to the 7.6 out of 10 overall rating of other Portable Bluetooth Speakers - while the Beats Pill+ (2015) performed worse than most of its competition, with an average score of 6.4.