Skullcandy Riff Wireless vs Beats Pro (2010)

The Skullcandy Riff Wireless managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and unbiased sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, namely Good Housekeeping and headphonesaddict.com. It performed great in their roundups - it earned the "Best for comfort" title from Good Housekeeping and "Ranked 3 out of 9" from headphonesaddict.com, which makes it a product worthy of consideration.

Moving on to the Beats Pro (2010): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like CNET, HomeTheaterReview.com, What Hi-Fi?, Laptop Mag, Head-fi, and Tom's Guide, enough for them to include them on those lists.

We tried doing a direct Skullcandy Riff Wireless vs. Beats Pro (2010) review score comparison but couldn't find any sources that tested both.

Next, we took a look at which sources liked them best and found that the Skullcandy Riff Wireless most impressed the reviewers at PCmag, who gave it a score of 7, whereas the Beats Pro (2010) did best in its CNET review - it scored 8.3 points.

Lastly, we calculated their review averages and compared them to their competitors. The average review score for Wireless Headphones in general is 7.3 out of 10, while the Skullcandy Riff Wireless and Beats Pro (2010) earned averages of 7.0 and 6.8, respectively.