Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
Opt out anytime
Loading
Beats Solo3 (2016)
Skullcandy Riff Wireless
See Top Ranked On-Ear Headphones

Beats Solo3 (2016) vs Skullcandy Riff Wireless

Analysis:

The Beats Solo3 (2016) and Skullcandy Riff Wireless make for very strong choices and are great On-Ear Headphones for their respective $120 and $39 asking prices. Depending on how much you're willing to spend, either of these options will serve you well.

The Beats Solo3 (2016) has impressed reviewers from two sources that are among the most highly trusted on the internet, namely Rtings and SoundGuys. It did great in their objective hands-on roundups - it earned the "Best On-Ear Wireless Headphones For Battery Life" and "Best on ear headphones" awards from Rtings and SoundGuys, respectively. That's high praise from such reputable sources.

As for the Skullcandy Riff Wireless - it was really well-received by reviewers at PCmag, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The Best On-Ear/Over-Ear Headphones for 2020" roundup and was named its "Best for Budget-Minded Bass Fans", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like PCmag, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.

Then we checked which sources liked these two On-Ear Headphones best and found that the Beats Solo3 (2016) got its highest, 9, review score from reviewers at Runnerclick, whereas the Skullcandy Riff Wireless earned its best score of 8 from Android Central.

Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The Skullcandy Riff Wireless managed to get 7.5 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.4 review average of On-Ear Headphones in general - whereas the Beats Solo3 (2016) earned 7.2 points.

It should be said that doing a direct Beats Solo3 (2016) vs. Skullcandy Riff Wireless comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.

Comparison of expert ratings
Highly Recommended
Recommended
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
Rtings
SoundGuys
TechGearLab
Tom's Guide
Wirecutter (NYTimes)
PCmag
Good Housekeeping
CNET
Techradar
TrustedReviews
Tech. Specs Comparison
Beats Solo3 (2016)
$120
Skullcandy Riff Wireless
$39
Noise-cancelling
No
No
Wireless
Yes
Yes
Has average expert review score
7.5
Overall Avg. for On-Ear Headphones
7.5
Avg. Review Score
Score
Highly recommended by trusted experts
Rtings
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best On-Ear Wireless Headphones For Battery Life
in “The 6 Best On-Ear Wireless Headphones - Summer 2020” 
Last updated: 9 days ago
SoundGuys
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best on ear headphones
in “Best Fashion Headphones for Men and Women” 
Last updated: 31 Mar 2017
TechGearLab
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Rated 5.9 out of 10
in “The Best Over-Ear Headphones of 2020” 
Last updated: 9 Jun 2020
Tom's Guide
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Ranked #7 out of 10
in “Beats headphones 2020: Top wireless and wired picks” 
Last updated: 4 Oct 2019
Reviewed
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Ranked #3 out of 6
in “The Best Headphones for the Gym of 2020” 
Last updated: 7 Oct 2019
Techradar
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Ranked #11 out of 12
in “Best on-ear headphones 2020: our pick of the best supra-aural cans” 
Last updated: 9 Jun 2020
The Spruce
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best Headphones
in “The 18 Best Graduation Gifts of 2020” 
TechGearLab
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Rated 5.9 out of 10
in “The Best Wireless Headphones of 2020” 
Last updated: 22 May 2020
The Spruce
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best for Music Lovers
in “The 9 Best Gifts for Women in 2020” 
Wirecutter (NYTimes)
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The Best Bluetooth Wireless Headphones” 
Last updated: 13 Apr 2020
BestReviews
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “Best Beats Headphones” 
Last updated: 6 days ago
Rtings
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The 7 Best Headphones For Running - Summer 2020” 
Last updated: 3 days ago
Tom's Guide
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “Best after Christmas sales of 2019” 
Last updated: 26 Dec 2019
Rtings
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Mentioned
in “The 6 Best On-Ear Headphones - Summer 2020” 
Last updated: 20 days ago
Recommended by trusted experts
PCmag
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best for Bass Fans on a Budget
in “The Best Cheap Earbuds and Headphones (Under $50)” 
Last updated: 31 Mar 2020
Good Housekeeping
Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best for comfort
in “9 best cheap headphones under £50” 
Last updated: a month ago
PCmag
Highly Trusted Source
Depth of
analysis
Yes
In-house
Testing
Best for Budget-Minded Bass Fans
in “The Best On-Ear/Over-Ear Headphones for 2020” 
Last updated: 18 Dec 2019

Find the best product and price, effortlessly.

Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products

We do the research. You save the money.
Add Lustre to Chrome
•  100% Free
Opt out anytime
undefinedurl nextprice drop