BeatsX (2017) vs Skullcandy Jib Wireless (2017)

The BeatsX (2017) has managed to do great in various roundups conducted by reviewers from highly trusted sources that perform objective in-depth testing, like Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, and Wareable - it was dubbed "Best Beats earphones for the price" by Tom's Guide, "Ranked 2 out of 15" by Laptop Mag, and "Ranked 3 out of 9" by Wareable. Any product that's held in such high regard by some of the most reliable sources should be considered by everyone who's looking for a Wireless Earphone at this price.

Returning to the Skullcandy Jib Wireless (SCS2DUW), Rtings, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Best Cheap Earbuds For Small Ears" in its "The 6 Best Earbuds For Small Ears - Summer 2023" roundup, which is quite a feat.

For a direct BeatsX (2017) vs. the Skullcandy Jib Wireless (SCS2DUW) comparison, we first examined sources that tested and scored both. Most of them, including Rtings, have found the Skullcandy Jib Wireless (SCS2DUW) to be the better product, while PCmag rated both equally.

When we took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most, we discovered that the BeatsX (2017) received its best, 9, score from Macworld, while the Skullcandy Jib Wireless (SCS2DUW) got its highest, 8, rating from PCmag.

Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the BeatsX (2017) earned an average review score of 7.6 out of 10 points and the Skullcandy Jib Wireless (SCS2DUW) received an average of 7.8, compared to the 7.2 average of Wireless Earphones in general.