Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Asus ROG Swift PG259QN vs BenQ SW series (2019)
The Asus ROG Swift PG259QN is a great Monitor for its $927 asking price.
The BenQ SW321C 32", however, while a reasonable product for $1999, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Monitors in the $2,000 range, you might want to check out some better options.
Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the Asus ROG Swift PG259QN to be a great product - it earned the "Best for Bar-None Highest Refresh for Extreme Esports" title from PCmag and "Best Gaming Monitor for eSports" from Tom's Hardware in their respective Monitor roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.
Moving on to the BenQ SW321C 32": it was loved by reviewers at shotkit.com and Techradar - two reliable sources that conduct objective in-depth testing. In fact, it was their "POPULAR CHOICE" and "Best 4K monitor for photographers", respectively, pointing towards it being a Monitor worth considering.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Asus ROG Swift PG259QN got its highest, 9.5, rating from TechSpot, while the BenQ SW321C 32" earned its best, 9, score from Digital Camera World.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Asus ROG Swift PG259QN and BenQ SW321C 32" managed averages of 8.9 and 8.3 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Asus ROG Swift PG259QN vs. BenQ SW321C 32" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing