Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
BenQ SW series (2019) vs Philips Brilliance 272P7VUBNB
Philips Brilliance 272P7VUBNB

The BenQ SW270C 27" is a great Monitor for its $799 asking price.
The Philips Brilliance 272P7VUBNB, however, is merely passable at its $344 price point. If you're considering buying a Monitor in the $450 range, you might want to check out some of its competitors.
The BenQ SW270C 27" hasn't managed to earn a top spot in any roundups from sources that conduct trustworthy hands-on testing. Nevertheless, reviewers from sites, such as Windows Central, camerajabber.com, and Digital Camera World all gave it a spot on their list.
As for our Philips Brilliance 272P7VUBNB analysis - two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out hands-on testing have found it to be a great product - it earned the "Budget pick" and "Best for Business Productivity and Docking Use" awards from Wirecutter (NYTimes) and PCmag, respectively, which is quite an impressive feat.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the BenQ SW270C 27" got its highest, 9.8, rating from MonitorNerds, while the Philips Brilliance 272P7VUBNB earned its best, 8, score from PCmag.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the BenQ SW270C 27" and Philips Brilliance 272P7VUBNB managed averages of 9.0 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct BenQ SW270C 27" vs. Philips Brilliance 272P7VUBNB comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing