Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Urbanista Seattle
The beyerdynamic DT 1350 and the Urbanista Seattle are decent Closed-Back Headphones at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $250 or $50.
If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the beyerdynamic DT 1350 and the Urbanista Seattle, however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:
The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the beyerdynamic DT 1350 in their Beyerdynamic Tesla DT 1350 review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the Urbanista Seattle - it impressed reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Best on-ear headphones 2020" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Excellent value wireless headphones that sound great for the price." title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Closed-Back Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the beyerdynamic DT 1350 got its highest, 8.9, rating from Head-fi, while the Urbanista Seattle earned its best, 10, score from What Hi-Fi?.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Closed-Back Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Closed-Back Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the beyerdynamic DT 1350 and Urbanista Seattle managed averages of 8.9 and 8.8 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs. Urbanista Seattle comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.