Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Grado SR125 (2014) vs beyerdynamic T90 (2012)
beyerdynamic T90 (2012)
The Grado SR125e (2014) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Open-Back Headphone for people with a $170 budget.
The beyerdynamic T90 (2012), however, is merely mediocre at its $2021 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $170 and $1,400 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Grado SR125e (2014) and beyerdynamic T90 (2012), however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The Grado SR125e (2014) hasn't managed to earn a top spot in any roundups from sources that conduct trustworthy hands-on testing. Nevertheless, reviewers from sites, such as What Hi-Fi?, Headphone Review, Rtings, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) all gave it a spot on their list.
Taking a look at the beyerdynamic T90 (2012), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - Head-fi and CNET - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Open-Back Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Grado SR125e (2014) got its highest, 10, rating from What Hi-Fi?, while the beyerdynamic T90 (2012) earned its best, 9.2, score from Head-fi.
Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The beyerdynamic T90 (2012) managed to get 8.7 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.8 review average of Open-Back Headphones in general - whereas the Grado SR125e (2014) earned 7.8 points.
It should be said that doing a direct Grado SR125e (2014) vs. beyerdynamic T90 (2012) comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.