Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Apogee Mic (2019) vs Blue Yeti Pro (2011)
The Apogee Hype MIC (2019) makes for a good, if unremarkable USB Microphone for people with a $160 budget. The Blue Yeti Pro 1967 (2011), however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $160 price range - chances are that there are better options available.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Apogee Hype MIC (2019) and Blue Yeti Pro 1967 (2011), however, we put together a summary of what we know:
The Apogee Hype MIC (2019) was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best USB Microphones for 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best for All-In-One Vocals Tool", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Blue Yeti Pro 1967 (2011) - it impressed reviewers at The Verge, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "The best microphones to start podcasting with" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Ranked 2 out of 14" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.
We tried doing a direct Apogee Hype MIC (2019) vs. Blue Yeti Pro 1967 (2011) review score comparison but couldn't find any sources that tested both.
Next, we took a look at which sources liked them best and found that the Apogee Hype MIC (2019) most impressed the reviewers at The Verge, who gave it a score of 9, whereas the Blue Yeti Pro 1967 (2011) did best in its Expert Reviews review - it scored 10 points.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Apogee Hype MIC (2019) earned an average review score of 8.5 out of 10 points and the Blue Yeti Pro 1967 (2011) received an average of 9.0, compared to the 7.7 average of USB Microphones in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing