Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Bose Companion 2 Series III vs Klipsch R-15PM (2016)
The Bose Companion 2 Series III is a great Computer Speaker for its $99 asking price.
The Klipsch R-15PM (2016), however, while a reasonable product for $249, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Computer Speakers in the $330 range, you might want to check out some better options.
Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the Bose Companion 2 Series III to be a great product - it earned the "Bose sound for an excellent value" title from Laptop Mag and "The best overall computer speakers" from Tom's Guide in their respective Computer Speaker roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.
As for the Klipsch R-15PM (2016) analysis - it impressed reviewers at TechSpot, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "The Best PC Speakers" roundup and earned the "Best Studio Speakers" title.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Computer Speakers, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Bose Companion 2 Series III got its highest, 8.6, rating from TechSpot, while the Klipsch R-15PM (2016) earned its best, 9, score from HomeTheaterReview.com.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Computer Speakers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Computer Speakers being 7.7 out of 10, whereas the Bose Companion 2 Series III and Klipsch R-15PM (2016) managed averages of 8.6 and 8.5 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Bose Companion 2 Series III vs. Klipsch R-15PM (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing