Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Shokz OpenRun Pro vs Bose QuietComfort 35 (2016)
Bose QuietComfort 35 (1st Gen, 2016)

The Shokz OpenRun Pro has done great in a couple of roundups conducted by highly trusted sources that perform objective in-depth testing, like Tom's Guide, CNET, bicycling.com, and SoundGuys - it earned the "The best bone-conduction headphones" title from Tom's Guide, "Best bone-conduction headphones" from CNET, and "Ranked 2 out of 9" from bicycling.com. Any product that's held in high regard by such reliable sources should be considered by anyone that's looking for a Earphone at this price point.
Taking a look at the Bose QuietComfort 35 (1st Gen, 2016), we found it was well-received by reviewers from a couple of reliable sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, including Gear Patrol, iMore, and Phandroid. It performed great in their Earphone roundups - it managed to earn the "Ranked 1 out of 7" title from Gear Patrol, "Ranked 1 out of 5" from iMore, and "Ranked 1 out of 8" from Phandroid, which is a notable accomplishment.
For a direct Shokz OpenRun Pro vs. the Bose QuietComfort 35 (1st Gen, 2016) comparison, we first examined sources that tested and scored both. Most of them, including SoundGuys, have found the Bose QuietComfort 35 (1st Gen, 2016) to be the better product, while Expert Reviews rated both equally.
When we took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most, we discovered that the Shokz OpenRun Pro received its best, 10, score from Expert Reviews, while the Bose QuietComfort 35 (1st Gen, 2016) got its highest, 10, rating from Expert Reviews.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Shokz OpenRun Pro earned an average review score of 8.4 out of 10 points and the Bose QuietComfort 35 (1st Gen, 2016) received an average of 8.9, compared to the 7.3 average of Earphones in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing