Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Polk Audio Command Soundbar (2018) vs Bose SoundTouch 300 Soundbar (2016)
Polk Audio Command Soundbar (2018) (AM9640)
Bose SoundTouch 300 Soundbar (2016) (767520-1100)
The Polk Audio Command Soundbar (2018) (AM9640) was loved by reviewers at CNET, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Make that halftime show sing: The best audio systems for the big game and beyond" roundup where it was named its "Ranked 3 out of 6", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Moving on to the Bose SoundTouch 300 Soundbar (2016) (767520-1100): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like PCmag, TechGearLab, Expert Reviews, Techradar, AVForums, CNET, TrustedReviews, and What Hi-Fi?, enough for them to include them on those lists.
Our direct Polk Audio Command Soundbar (2018) (AM9640) vs. Bose SoundTouch 300 Soundbar (2016) (767520-1100) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Soundbars, Expert Reviews, TrustedReviews, AVForums, and CNET preferred the Polk Audio Command Soundbar (2018) (AM9640), whereas Top Ten Reviews, PCmag, and Techradar seemed to like both equally.
We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Polk Audio Command Soundbar (2018) (AM9640) got its highest, 10, review score from Expert Reviews, while the Bose SoundTouch 300 Soundbar (2016) (767520-1100) most impressed reviewers at Top Ten Reviews, which gave it a score of 9.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Polk Audio Command Soundbar (2018) (AM9640) earned an average review score of 8.3 out of 10 points and the Bose SoundTouch 300 Soundbar (2016) (767520-1100) received an average of 7.8, compared to the 7.6 average of Soundbars in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing