Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Bowers & Wilkins C5 Series 2 (2014) vs KZ ZS6 (2017)
Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014)
We couldn't find enough data on either product to be able to come to any reliable conclusions. We highly recommend that you take a look at some other options instead.
The Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) hasn't managed to earn a top spot in any roundups from sources that conduct trustworthy hands-on testing. Nevertheless, reviewers from sites, such as PCmag, Head-fi, and CNET all gave it a spot on their list.
As for the KZ ZS6 (2017) - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its KZ Zs6 review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like Head-fi, and learned that they all showed a preference for the KZ ZS6 (2017).
Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two Earphones received. We found that the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) managed to earn a rating of 9 from PCmag, whereas the KZ ZS6 (2017) got its highest, 8.9, score from reviewers at Head-fi.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) and KZ ZS6 (2017) managed averages of 8.5 and 8.9 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) vs. KZ ZS6 (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.