Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Cambridge Audio Melomania 1 vs AfterShokz Trekz (2015)
AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015)

The Cambridge Audio Melomania 1 was loved by reviewers at Tom's Guide, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best wireless earbuds 2023: Our top picks for every budget" roundup where it was named its "No ANC, but a great-sounding earbud for less than $100", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Moving on to the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015): it has performed really well in a handful of roundups done by reliable sources that perform their own objective testing, like Popular Mechanics, MakeUseOf, nerdtechy.com, and Android Central - it was awarded the "Ranked 2 out of 8" title by Popular Mechanics, "Ranked 2 out of 7" by MakeUseOf, and "Ranked 1 out of 2" by nerdtechy.com, which marks it as a worthy candidate.
We also performed a thorough Cambridge Audio Melomania 1 vs. AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both Wireless Earphones, including TrustedReviews and Techradar, preferred the Cambridge Audio Melomania 1 over the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015).
Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the Cambridge Audio Melomania 1 turned out to be most loved by What Hi-Fi?, which gave it a score of 10, whereas the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) got its highest, 8, rating from reviewers at Digitaltrends.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Cambridge Audio Melomania 1 did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.8 out of 10, compared to the 7.2 overall average of Wireless Earphones in general, whereas the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 6.8.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing