Brother MFC-J995 (2018) vs Canon Pixma MG3620

The Brother MFC-J995DW and Canon Pixma MG3620 make for very strong choices and are great Home Printers for their respective $417 and $79 asking prices. Depending on how much you're willing to spend, either of these options will serve you well.

The Brother MFC-J995DW got praised by Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide - two highly trusted sources that perform in-depth hands-on testing. It was awarded the "A best-in-class all-in-one that can seriously do it all" title from Laptop Mag and "Ranked 1 out of 7" from Tom's Guide in their respective Home Printer roundups.

Returning to the Canon Pixma MG3620, it managed to impress reviewers from some of the internet's most highly trusted sources, Tom's Guide and Rtings. It performed great in their hands-on roundups - it was named "Top budget pick" by Tom's Guide and "Ranked 2 out of 5" by Rtings. That's quite an achievement, especially coming from such high-quality sources.

We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like Gadget Review, and learned that they all showed a preference for the Canon Pixma MG3620.

Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two Home Printers received. We found that the Brother MFC-J995DW managed to earn a rating of 9 from TechGearLab, whereas the Canon Pixma MG3620 got its highest, 8.8, score from reviewers at Gadget Review.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Home Printers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Home Printers being 7.1 out of 10, whereas the Brother MFC-J995DW and Canon Pixma MG3620 managed averages of 8.3 and 8.8 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Brother MFC-J995DW vs. Canon Pixma MG3620 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.