CCA C10 vs Beats urBeats 3 (2012)

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for our analysis of the Beats urBeats 3 (2012) - it's considered to be a great product by two reliable sources that do their own hands-on testing - it earned the "Best wired in-ear headphones" award from Good Housekeeping and "Ranked 2 out of 8" from iMore, which is no small feat.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these In-Ear Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the CCA C10 got its highest, 9.1, rating from Head-fi, while the Beats urBeats 3 (2012) earned its best, 7.5, score from SoundGuys.

Lastly, in order to better compare them to their competition, we averaged out their review scores and found that the CCA C10 got received considerably better than the majority of other In-Ear Monitors - it earned an average of 9.1 out of 10 points, compared to the 7.7 overall rating of other In-Ear Monitors - while the Beats urBeats 3 (2012) performed worse than most of its competitors, with its average review score of 5.9.

It's worth keeping in mind, however, that a direct CCA C10 vs. Beats urBeats 3 (2012) comparison might not be realistic since they're priced differently and some sources have a tendency to review more expensive products better than cheaper ones.