Bose SoundSport Wireless (2016) vs CCA C10

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Returning to the Bose SoundSport Wireless (2016) - it was really well-received by reviewers at bicycling.com and Wareable, which are among the most highly trusted sources on the internet and are known for their in-depth hands-on testing. It was named "Best Sound Quality" by bicycling.com and "Ranked 2 out of 9" by Wareable, which points toward the Bose SoundSport Wireless (2016) being a high-quality product.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these In-Ear Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the CCA C10 got its highest, 9.1, rating from Head-fi, while the Bose SoundSport Wireless (2016) earned its best, 10, score from What Hi-Fi?.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other In-Ear Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by In-Ear Monitors being 7.7 out of 10, whereas the CCA C10 and Bose SoundSport Wireless (2016) managed averages of 9.1 and 8.3 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct CCA C10 vs. Bose SoundSport Wireless (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.