Jabra Evolve 65T vs CCA C10

While the CCA C10 makes for a fairly good In-Ear Monitor for people with a $40 budget, we weren't able to find enough data on the Jabra Evolve 65T to come to any reliable conclusions.

In either case, we suggest that you look at some other options at the $40 and $360 budget ranges before committing to one of these.

If you'd nonetheless like to learn more about the CCA C10 and Jabra Evolve 65T, however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Jabra Evolve 65T - Rtings, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Jabra Evolve 65t Truly Wireless Headphones Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these In-Ear Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the CCA C10 got its highest, 9.1, rating from Head-fi, while the Jabra Evolve 65T earned its best, 7.2, score from Rtings.

Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the CCA C10, with its 9.1 average, performed considerably better than most In-Ear Monitors - the mean score for the product category being 7.7 out of 10 - while the Jabra Evolve 65T managed an average of 7.2.

There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct CCA C10 vs. Jabra Evolve 65T review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.