Jaybird Run (2017) vs CCA C10

While the CCA C10 makes for a fairly good In-Ear Monitor for people with a $40 budget, we haven't been able to find enough data on the Jaybird Run (2017) to come to any reliable conclusions.

In both cases, however, you might want to look into some other options before settling on one of these.

If you nevertheless want to learn more about the CCA C10 and Jaybird Run (2017), however, here's what we know about them:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Returning to the Jaybird Run (2017), gearinstitute.com, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Ranked 1 out of 5" in its "Running Headphones & Earbuds" roundup, which is quite a feat.

We also performed a thorough CCA C10 vs. Jaybird Run (2017) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both In-Ear Monitors, including Head-fi, preferred the CCA C10 over the Jaybird Run (2017).

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the CCA C10 turned out to be most loved by Head-fi, which gave it a score of 9.1, whereas the Jaybird Run (2017) got its highest, 9.5, rating from reviewers at PhoneArena.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the CCA C10 did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 9.1 out of 10, compared to the 7.7 overall average of In-Ear Monitors in general, whereas the Jaybird Run (2017) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.7.