CCA C10 vs Plantronics BackBeat FIT 300 (2017)

While the CCA C10 makes for a fairly good In-Ear Monitor for people with a $40 budget, we weren't able to find enough data on the Plantronics BackBeat FIT 300 (2017) to come to any reliable conclusions.

In either case, we suggest that you look at some other options at the $40 and $19 budget ranges before committing to one of these.

If you'd nonetheless like to learn more about the CCA C10 and Plantronics BackBeat FIT 300 (2017), however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Moving on to the Plantronics BackBeat FIT 300 (2017): no sources that perform reliable and objective hands-on testing have included it in their In-Ear Monitor roundups, which usually means that a product doesn't make for a good purchase.

Lastly, we tried to do a direct CCA C10 vs. Plantronics BackBeat FIT 300 (2017) comparison of review ratings between these two products, but couldn't find any review scores for the Plantronics BackBeat FIT 300 (2017).

Compared to all other In-Ear Monitors on the market, however, the CCA C10 performed great. When averaged out, it earned a rating of 9.1 out of 10, which is much better than the 7.7 review average of In-Ear Monitors in general.