Shure SE425 (2010) vs CCA C10

While the CCA C10 makes for a fairly good In-Ear Monitor for people with a $40 budget, we weren't able to find enough data on the Shure SE425 (2010) to come to any reliable conclusions.

In either case, we suggest that you look at some other options at the $40 and $260 budget ranges before committing to one of these.

If you'd nonetheless like to learn more about the CCA C10 and Shure SE425 (2010), however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Shure SE425 (2010) - it impressed reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "The best headphones you can buy in 2023" roundup - in fact, it earned its "An excellent pair of no-compromise in-ear headphones." title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these In-Ear Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the CCA C10 got its highest, 9.1, rating from Head-fi, while the Shure SE425 (2010) earned its best, 10, score from What Hi-Fi?.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other In-Ear Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by In-Ear Monitors being 7.7 out of 10, whereas the CCA C10 and Shure SE425 (2010) managed averages of 9.1 and 8.3 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct CCA C10 vs. Shure SE425 (2010) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.