Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Huawei Freebuds 3 vs CCA C12
The Huawei Freebuds 3 makes for a good, if unremarkable, Earphone for people with a $140 budget.
The CCA C12, however, is merely mediocre at its $48 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $140 and $60 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Huawei Freebuds 3 and CCA C12, however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The Huawei Freebuds 3 was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best audio products at IFA 2019" roundup where it was named its "Ranked 2 out of 6", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the CCA C12 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its CCA C12 review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Huawei Freebuds 3 got its highest, 9, rating from PhoneArena, while the CCA C12 earned its best, 9, score from Head-fi.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Huawei Freebuds 3 and CCA C12 managed averages of 7.6 and 9.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Huawei Freebuds 3 vs. CCA C12 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.