Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Klipsch R6 II (2017) vs CCA C12
The Klipsch R6 II (2017) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Canal Earphone for people with a $35 budget.
The CCA C12, however, is merely mediocre at its $48 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $35 and $45 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Klipsch R6 II (2017) and CCA C12, however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The Klipsch R6 II (2017) was loved by reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, a trustworthy source that performs objective hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best headphones 2020" roundup - in fact, they named it their "One of the best in-ear upgrades you'll ever make.". That, by itself, points toward it being a noteworthy Canal Earphone.
As for the CCA C12 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its CCA C12 review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Canal Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Klipsch R6 II (2017) got its highest, 10, rating from What Hi-Fi?, while the CCA C12 earned its best, 9, score from Head-fi.
Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The CCA C12 managed to get 9.0 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.4 review average of Canal Earphones in general - whereas the Klipsch R6 II (2017) earned 10.0 points.
It should be said that doing a direct Klipsch R6 II (2017) vs. CCA C12 comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.