Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
KZ ZST (2016) vs CCA C12
The KZ ZST (2016) makes for a good, if unremarkable In-Ear Monitor for people with a $25 budget. The CCA C12, however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $25 price range - chances are that there are better options available.
If you're still interested in learning more about the KZ ZST (2016) and CCA C12, however, we put together a summary of what we know:
The KZ ZST (2016) was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 5 Best Cheap Earphones - Fall 2020" roundup where it was named its "Runner Up for Best Cheap Earbuds - Wired Alternative", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the CCA C12 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its CCA C12 review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
As for a direct KZ ZST (2016) vs. CCA C12 comparison of their review performance, we examined sources that tested and rated both products, like Head-fi. It turns out that all such sources consider the CCA C12 to be the superior product.
We also looked at the available data to find which sources liked each of them best and learned that the KZ ZST (2016) most impressed reviewers at Head-fi - they gave it a score of 8.3, whereas the CCA C12 got rated best by Head-fi - 9.
Lastly, we averaged out all of their review data to compare them to their competitors. We found that the CCA C12, with its 9.0 out of 10 points, got reviewed noticeably better than most of its competitors - the average In-Ear Monitor score being 7.7 - whereas the KZ ZST (2016) performed worse, with an average of merely 6.9.