Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100 vs CCA C12
Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100
The Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100 makes for a good, if unremarkable, Earphone for people with a $30 budget.
The CCA C12, however, is merely mediocre at its $48 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $30 and $45 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100 and CCA C12, however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100 got praised by SoundGuys and Tom's Guide - two highly trusted sources that perform in-depth hands-on testing. It was awarded the "Best durability" title from SoundGuys and "The best cheap wireless earbuds for fitness" from Tom's Guide in their respective Earphone roundups.
As for the CCA C12 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its CCA C12 review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100 got its highest, 8, rating from Tom's Guide, while the CCA C12 earned its best, 9.3, score from Head-fi.
Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The CCA C12 managed to get 9.3 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.3 review average of Earphones in general - whereas the Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100 earned 6.5 points.
It should be said that doing a direct Plantronics BackBeat FIT 3100 vs. CCA C12 comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.